39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ39AICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
-100.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes with financial intermediaries. Provides critical insight into financial transaction complexity.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Measures dispute volume between institutions and financial intermediaries. Indicates potential transactional friction in financial markets.
Methodology
Surveys financial institutions about dispute frequency and volume.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and financial risk managers to assess market interactions.
Key Facts
- Tracks financial transaction disputes
- Measures intermediary relationship tensions
- Indicates potential market friction
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Tracks volume of mark and collateral disputes with financial intermediaries. Indicates transactional complexity.
Q: Why are these dispute trends significant?
A: Reveals potential friction in financial markets. Helps understand institutional relationship dynamics.
Q: How is this data collected?
A: Quarterly surveys of financial institutions about dispute volumes and characteristics.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Risk managers, regulators, and financial analysts use this to assess market interactions.
Q: What are the data's potential limitations?
A: Represents reported disputes, which might not capture all transactional nuances.
Related Trends
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ70B2TCNR
69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency RMBS Market Changed?| Answer Type: Improved Somewhat
SFQ69MONR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ66A2ECNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ40AISNR
45) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Credit Derivatives Referencing Corporates (Single-Name Corporates or Corporate Indexes) Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
OTCDQ45ADSNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 5. Increased Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ25B52MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Financial Dispute Volumes (ALLQ39AICNR), retrieved from FRED.