Number of Respondents, Quarterly, Not Seasonally Adjusted

ALLQ13A6NINR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

0.00

Year-over-Year Change

N/A%

Date Range

7/1/2011 - 10/1/2011

Summary

Tracks quarterly survey respondent count for specific economic research. Provides critical insight into data collection methodology and sample representation.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

This metric represents the total number of participants in a quarterly economic survey. It helps researchers assess data reliability and statistical significance.

Methodology

Calculated by counting unique survey participants during each quarterly reporting period.

Historical Context

Used by economists to validate survey-based economic research and statistical analyses.

Key Facts

  • Quarterly tracking of survey participation
  • Indicates research sample consistency
  • Critical for statistical validity

FAQs

Q: What does this series measure?

A: Tracks the number of survey participants in a specific quarterly economic research effort.

Q: Why is respondent count important?

A: Larger sample sizes increase statistical reliability and research accuracy.

Q: How often is this data updated?

A: Data is updated quarterly, providing consistent tracking of survey participation.

Q: Can sample size affect research conclusions?

A: Yes, sample size directly impacts the statistical significance and generalizability of research findings.

Q: What limitations exist in this data?

A: Respondent count alone doesn't guarantee research quality; methodology and sampling technique are crucial.

Related Trends

79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| B. High-Yield Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

ALLQ79BDCNR

74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably

ALLQ74A3ECNR

25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important

ALLQ25B43MINR

39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Insurance Companies. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ39ERBUNR

51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Commodity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

OTCDQ51FRBUNR

31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, Isda Protocols). | Answer Type: First in Importance

ALLQ31B3MINR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Number of Respondents (ALLQ13A6NINR), retrieved from FRED.