Number of Large Domestic Banks That Eased and Reported That More Aggressive Competition From Other Banks or Nonbank Lenders Was Not an Important Reason
SUBLPDCIREANLGNQ • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
-50.00%
Date Range
7/1/2001 - 7/1/2025
Summary
Tracks large domestic banks' lending conditions and competitive landscape. Provides insight into banking sector credit availability and market dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This metric reflects changes in large banks' lending standards and competitive pressures. It helps economists understand credit market conditions.
Methodology
Collected through Federal Reserve bank lending survey of large domestic financial institutions.
Historical Context
Used by policymakers to assess banking sector health and credit market trends.
Key Facts
- Indicates bank lending flexibility
- Reflects competitive banking environment
- Part of Federal Reserve economic monitoring
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: It tracks large banks' lending ease and competitive conditions in the financial market.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically updated quarterly through Federal Reserve bank lending surveys.
Q: Why is this indicator important?
A: Provides insights into credit availability and banking sector competitive dynamics.
Q: How do economists use this data?
A: To assess credit market conditions and potential economic expansion or contraction.
Q: What limitations exist in this data?
A: Represents a snapshot of surveyed banks and may not capture entire banking ecosystem.
Related Trends
Number of Foreign Banks That Reported Weaker Commercial and Industrial Loan Demand and Reported That Decreased Customer Inventory Financing Needs Was a Very Important Reason
SUBLPFCIRWIVNQ
Number of Other Domestic Banks That Eased and Reported That Improvement in Current or Expected Capital Position Was a Very Important Reason
SUBLPDCIRECVOTHNQ
Net Percentage of Domestic Banks Tightening Standards Across Loan Categories, Weighted by Banks' Outstanding Loan Balances by Category
SUBLPDMOSXWBNQ
Number of Other Domestic Banks That Tightened and Reported That Decreased Liquidity in the Secondary Market for These (Commercial and Industrial) Loans Was Not an Important Reason
SUBLPDCIRTSNOTHNQ
Number of Domestic Banks That Tightened and Reported That Less Aggressive Competition From Other Banks or Nonbank Lenders Was a Somewhat Important Reason
SUBLPDCIRTASNQ
Number of Other Domestic Banks That Eased and Reported That Reduced Concerns About the Effects of Legislative Changes, Supervisory Actions, or Changes in Accounting Standards Was a Very Important Reason
SUBLPDCIREEVOTHNQ
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Number of Large Domestic Banks That Eased and Reported That More Aggressive Competition From Other Banks or Nonbank Lenders Was Not an Important Reason (SUBLPDCIREANLGNQ), retrieved from FRED.