78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| C. Equities. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
SFQ78CICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in mark and collateral disputes for equity-based lending contracts. Provides critical insights into equity lending market dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This economic indicator tracks dispute volume in equity lending collateral contracts. It helps assess financial market transaction complexity.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions tracking equity lending dispute changes.
Historical Context
Used by investment professionals to understand equity lending market tensions.
Key Facts
- Monitors equity lending contract dispute trends
- Indicates potential equity market stress
- Quarterly survey-based measurement
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator track?
A: Measures volume changes in mark and collateral disputes for equity-based lending contracts.
Q: How often is this data refreshed?
A: Updated quarterly through financial market surveys.
Q: Why are equity lending disputes significant?
A: They reveal potential friction in equity lending markets and broader financial system dynamics.
Q: Who monitors these dispute trends?
A: Investment analysts, risk managers, and financial regulators use this data.
Q: What are the data collection limitations?
A: Survey-based reporting may have inherent sampling and reporting variability.
Related Trends
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ62B2TCNR
6) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Hedge Funds Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 4 and 5), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 2. Increased Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ06B2MINR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ19B4MINR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ19A72MINR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 5. Increased Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ19B53MINR
77) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Consumer Abs Market Changed?| Answer Type: Deteriorated Considerably
ALLQ77TNNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Equity Lending Disputes (SFQ78CICNR), retrieved from FRED.