51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
OTCDQ51DDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Monitors changes in mark and collateral disputes for corporate credit contracts. Provides insights into corporate credit market dynamics and transaction smoothness.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks dispute duration and persistence in corporate credit referencing. It helps understand corporate credit market friction and transaction efficiency.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions tracking corporate contract disputes.
Historical Context
Used by analysts and policymakers to assess corporate credit market conditions.
Key Facts
- Indicates decreased dispute complexity in corporate credits
- Reflects potential improvement in credit transaction processes
- Signals potential market efficiency enhancement
FAQs
Q: What do corporate credit disputes measure?
A: They track challenges in credit contract valuation and processing among corporate entities.
Q: Why track corporate credit disputes?
A: To understand market efficiency and potential friction in corporate credit transactions.
Q: How frequently are these tracked?
A: Typically measured quarterly to capture ongoing market trends and changes.
Q: Do these disputes impact lending?
A: Yes, dispute levels can influence corporate lending practices and credit availability.
Q: What does a decrease in disputes indicate?
A: Potentially smoother credit transactions and improved market communication processes.
Related News
Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...
U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
75) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Consumer ABS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
SFQ75DCNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ37A62MINR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ62B2ECNR
69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency Rmbs Market Changed?| Answer Type: Deteriorated Somewhat
ALLQ69EONR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer ABS (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
SFQ74A4TSNR
43) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Interest Rate Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
OTCDQ43ADSNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Credit Referencing Disputes (OTCDQ51DDCNR), retrieved from FRED.