51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
OTCDQ51CICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
-100.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes in equity contracts. Provides insight into financial market transaction complexity and potential risk areas.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator measures shifts in contractual dispute characteristics within equity markets. It helps analysts understand transactional friction and potential systemic financial challenges.
Methodology
Surveyed financial institutions report changes in contract dispute parameters quarterly.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and risk managers to assess market transaction stability.
Key Facts
- Quarterly survey-based metric
- Focuses on equity contract interactions
- Indicates market transaction complexity
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: It tracks changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes in equity contracts over three months.
Q: Why are contract disputes important?
A: They reveal potential friction and risk in financial market transactions and contractual relationships.
Q: How often is this data collected?
A: The data is collected and reported quarterly by financial institutions.
Q: Who uses this economic indicator?
A: Regulators, risk managers, and financial analysts use this to assess market stability.
Q: What are the limitations of this indicator?
A: It relies on survey responses and represents a snapshot of reported experiences.
Related News
Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...
U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
2) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Amount of Resources and Attention Your Firm Devotes to Management of Concentrated Credit Exposure to Central Counterparties and Other Financial Utilities Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ02DSNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including Mbs and Abs. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ51EDCNR
41) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Nonprice Terms Incorporated in New or Renegotiated OTC Derivatives Master Agreements Put in Place with Your Institution's Clients Changed?| C. Recognition of Portfolio or Diversification Benefits (Including from Securities Financing Trades Where Appropriate Agreements Are in Place). | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
OTCDQ41CESNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ62B1TCNR
35) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Nonfinancial Corporations as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ35RBUNR
75) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Consumer ABS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
SFQ75DCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Equity Contract Dispute Trends (OTCDQ51CICNR), retrieved from FRED.