51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| C. Equity. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
OTCDQ51CICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
-100.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes in equity contracts. Provides insight into financial market transaction complexity and potential risk areas.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator measures shifts in contractual dispute characteristics within equity markets. It helps analysts understand transactional friction and potential systemic financial challenges.
Methodology
Surveyed financial institutions report changes in contract dispute parameters quarterly.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and risk managers to assess market transaction stability.
Key Facts
- Quarterly survey-based metric
- Focuses on equity contract interactions
- Indicates market transaction complexity
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: It tracks changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes in equity contracts over three months.
Q: Why are contract disputes important?
A: They reveal potential friction and risk in financial market transactions and contractual relationships.
Q: How often is this data collected?
A: The data is collected and reported quarterly by financial institutions.
Q: Who uses this economic indicator?
A: Regulators, risk managers, and financial analysts use this to assess market stability.
Q: What are the limitations of this indicator?
A: It relies on survey responses and represents a snapshot of reported experiences.
Related Trends
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ37A72MINR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 2. Increased Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ37B22MINR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Insurance Companies. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
CTQ40EICNR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ70A4TCNR
21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed Over the Past Three Months?| D. Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ21DDCNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 2. Increased Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ37B2MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Equity Contract Dispute Trends (OTCDQ51CICNR), retrieved from FRED.