51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably

OTCDQ51BICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

1.00

Year-over-Year Change

N/A%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025

Summary

This economic indicator tracks changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes related to interest rate contracts over a three-month period. The trend provides insights into financial market friction and potential challenges in contract resolution.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

The metric reflects the complexity and potential disputes in interest rate-related financial contracts, which can signal underlying market stress or contractual ambiguity. Economists use this data to understand potential friction points in financial transactions and market liquidity.

Methodology

Data is collected through systematic survey and reporting mechanisms tracking contract disputes in financial markets.

Historical Context

This indicator is used by financial regulators and market analysts to assess potential systemic risks and contract negotiation dynamics.

Key Facts

  • Tracks changes in dispute duration for interest rate contracts
  • Provides insight into potential market stress and contractual challenges
  • Measures three-month trends in mark and collateral disputes

FAQs

Q: What does this economic indicator measure?

A: It measures the duration and persistence of disputes related to interest rate contracts over a three-month period, indicating potential market friction.

Q: Why are mark and collateral disputes important?

A: These disputes can signal underlying market tensions, potential valuation challenges, and risks in financial contract negotiations.

Q: How is this data collected?

A: The data is gathered through systematic surveys and reporting mechanisms tracking financial contract disputes across various markets.

Q: Who uses this economic indicator?

A: Financial regulators, market analysts, and economists use this data to assess systemic risks and understand market dynamics.

Q: How frequently is this indicator updated?

A: The indicator is typically updated on a quarterly basis, reflecting three-month trends in contract disputes.

Related News

Related Trends

44) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Equity Derivatives Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ44BRBUNR

42) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC FX Derivatives Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably

OTCDQ42BICNR

25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 4. Higher Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

CTQ25A42MINR

31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important

CTQ31B43MINR

79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| F. CMBS. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat

SFQ79FISNR

19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 1. Improvement in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important

CTQ19B13MINR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, 51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably [OTCDQ51BICNR], retrieved from FRED.

Last Checked: 8/1/2025

51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably | US Economic Trends