51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
OTCDQ51BICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
This economic indicator tracks changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes related to interest rate contracts over a three-month period. The trend provides insights into financial market friction and potential challenges in contract resolution.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
The metric reflects the complexity and potential disputes in interest rate-related financial contracts, which can signal underlying market stress or contractual ambiguity. Economists use this data to understand potential friction points in financial transactions and market liquidity.
Methodology
Data is collected through systematic survey and reporting mechanisms tracking contract disputes in financial markets.
Historical Context
This indicator is used by financial regulators and market analysts to assess potential systemic risks and contract negotiation dynamics.
Key Facts
- Tracks changes in dispute duration for interest rate contracts
- Provides insight into potential market stress and contractual challenges
- Measures three-month trends in mark and collateral disputes
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: It measures the duration and persistence of disputes related to interest rate contracts over a three-month period, indicating potential market friction.
Q: Why are mark and collateral disputes important?
A: These disputes can signal underlying market tensions, potential valuation challenges, and risks in financial contract negotiations.
Q: How is this data collected?
A: The data is gathered through systematic surveys and reporting mechanisms tracking financial contract disputes across various markets.
Q: Who uses this economic indicator?
A: Financial regulators, market analysts, and economists use this data to assess systemic risks and understand market dynamics.
Q: How frequently is this indicator updated?
A: The indicator is typically updated on a quarterly basis, reflecting three-month trends in contract disputes.
Related Trends
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
CTQ40AISNR
52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ52B1ECNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Insurance Companies. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ40EICNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 6. Improvement in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ19B6MINR
13) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Trading Reits Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 11 and 12), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ13A1MINR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ40DISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, 51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably [OTCDQ51BICNR], retrieved from FRED.
Last Checked: 8/1/2025