51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. FX. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
OTCDQ51AISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
2.00
Year-over-Year Change
-33.33%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for foreign exchange contracts. Provides insights into financial market friction and contractual complexity.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator measures dispute duration and persistence in FX contract settlements. It reflects potential challenges in financial market transactions.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions tracking contract dispute characteristics.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and financial analysts to assess market transaction smoothness.
Key Facts
- Indicates increased dispute complexity in FX markets
- Reflects potential transactional challenges
- Important for risk management assessment
FAQs
Q: What does this series measure?
A: Tracks duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes in foreign exchange contracts over three months.
Q: Why are FX contract disputes important?
A: They signal potential friction in financial markets and can indicate systemic transaction challenges.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically collected quarterly through financial institution surveys.
Q: What does 'increased somewhat' mean?
A: Suggests a moderate rise in dispute complexity or duration for FX contracts.
Q: Who uses this data?
A: Regulators, financial analysts, and risk management professionals monitor these trends.
Related News
Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...
U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
6) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Hedge Funds Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 4 and 5), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ06A6MINR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ37A73MINR
12) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Trading Reits Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ12ECNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ25B4MINR
12) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Trading REITs Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
CTQ12TSNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ66A3ECNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, FX Contract Dispute Duration (OTCDQ51AISNR), retrieved from FRED.