50) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Credit Referencing Corporates. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
OTCDQ50DICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
-100.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures significant increases in mark and collateral disputes for credit referencing corporate contracts. Provides critical insights into corporate financial interactions.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks dispute volume in corporate credit referencing contracts. It reveals potential tensions in corporate financial relationships.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions tracking dispute frequency.
Historical Context
Used by credit analysts and corporate risk managers to assess market dynamics.
Key Facts
- Significant increase in corporate credit disputes
- Reflects potential credit market tensions
- Indicates evolving corporate financial landscapes
FAQs
Q: What does this series indicate?
A: Shows considerable increase in disputes related to corporate credit referencing contracts.
Q: Why are these corporate credit disputes significant?
A: Can signal potential credit market stress or changing corporate financial dynamics.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: Quarterly surveys capture changes in dispute volumes across corporate credit markets.
Q: Who monitors these dispute trends?
A: Credit analysts, risk managers, and corporate financial strategists use this data.
Q: What might cause these disputes?
A: Typically result from credit assessment differences, contract interpretations, or market changes.
Related Trends
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ56B1RBUNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ39DISNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ19A6MINR
6) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Hedge Funds Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 4 and 5), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 2. Increased Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ06B2MINR
11) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Price Terms (for Example, Financing Rates) Offered to Trading Reits as Reflected Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Nonprice Terms?| Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
ALLQ11TSNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ37A12MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Credit Referencing Disputes (OTCDQ50DICNR), retrieved from FRED.