38) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Nonfinancial Corporations to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat

CTQ38DSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

0.00

Year-over-Year Change

N/A%

Date Range

10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025

Summary

Measures the decline in negotiation intensity for nonfinancial corporations seeking pricing terms. Provides insights into changing corporate strategies and market conditions.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

This indicator tracks reductions in corporate negotiation efforts across different business sectors. It reflects evolving market dynamics and competitive landscapes.

Methodology

Survey-based data collection from nonfinancial corporate responses about negotiation trends.

Historical Context

Utilized by economists to analyze corporate strategic shifts and market conditions.

Key Facts

  • Indicates potential market stabilization
  • Reflects changing corporate strategies
  • Measures negotiation intensity quarterly

FAQs

Q: What does this economic indicator represent?

A: Tracks the decrease in nonfinancial corporations' efforts to negotiate pricing and terms.

Q: How frequently is this data updated?

A: Updated quarterly to provide current insights into corporate negotiation trends.

Q: Why track negotiation intensity decline?

A: Helps understand market conditions, corporate strategies, and potential economic shifts.

Q: How do researchers interpret this data?

A: As a signal of market stability, competitive dynamics, and corporate strategic adjustments.

Q: What limitations exist in this measurement?

A: Represents a snapshot of corporate perceptions and may not capture all market nuances.

Related News

Related Trends

70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat

ALLQ70A1TSNR

39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Insurance Companies. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

CTQ39EDCNR

34) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Investment Advisers Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably

CTQ34DCNR

52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat

SFQ52B2ESNR

69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency RMBS Market Changed?| Answer Type: Deteriorated Considerably

SFQ69TNNR

13) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Trading REITs Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 11 and 12), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 2. Reduced Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: First In Importance

CTQ13A2MINR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Negotiation Decline (CTQ38DSNR), retrieved from FRED.