31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 2. Reduced Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important

CTQ31A23MINR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

0.00

Year-over-Year Change

N/A%

Date Range

1/1/2012 - 4/1/2025

Summary

Measures institutional risk appetite and willingness to engage in financial transactions. Provides critical insights into financial sector risk management strategies.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

Tracks institutional risk tolerance levels in investment and financial markets. Indicates changes in risk perception and management approaches.

Methodology

Survey-based data collection from financial institutions about risk tolerance.

Historical Context

Used by economists to assess financial sector risk sentiment and potential market constraints.

Key Facts

  • Reflects institutional risk management decisions
  • Indicates financial sector risk appetite
  • Provides insights into market constraints

FAQs

Q: What determines an institution's risk tolerance?

A: Factors include economic conditions, regulatory environment, and internal risk management policies.

Q: How do institutions measure risk tolerance?

A: Through comprehensive risk assessment models, stress testing, and financial performance analysis.

Q: Why does risk tolerance change?

A: Economic uncertainty, market volatility, and regulatory changes can significantly impact risk perception.

Q: How frequently is risk tolerance assessed?

A: Most institutions conduct regular quarterly or annual risk tolerance evaluations.

Q: What are the implications of reduced risk tolerance?

A: Can lead to more conservative investment strategies and potentially reduced market liquidity.

Related Trends

66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ66B2RBUNR

10) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Hedge Funds Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat

ALLQ10DSNR

22) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ22RBUNR

6) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Hedge Funds Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 4 and 5), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 5. Increased Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important

CTQ06B53MINR

6) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Hedge Funds Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 4 and 5), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important

CTQ06B72MINR

51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including Mbs and Abs. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ51ERBUNR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Institutional Risk Survey (CTQ31A23MINR), retrieved from FRED.