26) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Insurance Companies to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ26DCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 4/1/2025
Summary
Measures the reduction in negotiation intensity for insurance company terms. Provides insights into market dynamics and competitive pressures.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Tracks changes in how aggressively insurance companies negotiate pricing and contract terms. Reflects market competitiveness and risk appetite.
Methodology
Surveyed through periodic assessments of insurance industry professionals.
Historical Context
Used to understand strategic shifts in insurance market negotiations.
Key Facts
- Indicates reduced negotiation efforts
- Reflects changing market conditions
- Provides insight into industry competitiveness
FAQs
Q: What causes decreased negotiation intensity?
A: Market stabilization, reduced competition, or changes in risk perception can lead to decreased negotiation efforts.
Q: How does this impact insurance pricing?
A: Reduced negotiation intensity might indicate more stable pricing or less competitive market conditions.
Q: Why track negotiation intensity?
A: It helps understand market dynamics, competitive landscape, and potential shifts in insurance strategies.
Q: Does decreased intensity mean less innovation?
A: Not necessarily. It could reflect market maturity or standardization of practices.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Typically updated quarterly to capture recent market trends and changes.
Related Trends
22) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ22DCNR
44) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Equity Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ44AICNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
SFQ56A1ECNR
9) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Availability of Additional (and Currently Unutilized) Financial Leverage Under Agreements Currently in Place with Hedge Funds (for Example, Under Prime Broker, Warehouse Agreements, and Other Committed but Undrawn or Partly Drawn Facilities) Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ09ISNR
22) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ22DSNR
21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed Over the Past Three Months?| C. Pension Plans. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
CTQ21CISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Insurance Negotiation Intensity (CTQ26DCNR), retrieved from FRED.