79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| B. High-Yield Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ79BISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes for high-yield corporate bonds. Provides insights into lending market complexity and risk assessment.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This economic indicator measures dispute characteristics in high-yield corporate bond lending markets. It helps assess market friction and transaction challenges.
Methodology
Collected through survey responses from financial institutions and market participants.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and investors to understand corporate bond market dynamics.
Key Facts
- Indicates lending market transaction complexity
- Reflects high-yield bond market tensions
- Signals potential risk assessment challenges
FAQs
Q: What do high-yield bond lending disputes indicate?
A: They reveal potential market friction and risk assessment challenges in corporate bond transactions.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically collected quarterly through financial market surveys.
Q: Why are these disputes important?
A: They provide insights into market liquidity and potential lending constraints.
Q: Who uses this economic indicator?
A: Regulators, investors, and financial analysts monitor these dispute metrics.
Q: What does an increase in disputes suggest?
A: Potentially increased market uncertainty or heightened risk perception.
Related Trends
55) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the High-Grade Corporate Bond Market Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ55RBUNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Insurance Companies. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ40EDSNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 4. Higher Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ37A43MINR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ40DRBUNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ66A2RBUNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ40BISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, High-Yield Corporate Bond Lending Disputes (ALLQ79BISNR), retrieved from FRED.