79) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| B. High-Yield Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ79BISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes for high-yield corporate bonds. Provides insights into lending market complexity and risk assessment.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This economic indicator measures dispute characteristics in high-yield corporate bond lending markets. It helps assess market friction and transaction challenges.
Methodology
Collected through survey responses from financial institutions and market participants.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and investors to understand corporate bond market dynamics.
Key Facts
- Indicates lending market transaction complexity
- Reflects high-yield bond market tensions
- Signals potential risk assessment challenges
FAQs
Q: What do high-yield bond lending disputes indicate?
A: They reveal potential market friction and risk assessment challenges in corporate bond transactions.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically collected quarterly through financial market surveys.
Q: Why are these disputes important?
A: They provide insights into market liquidity and potential lending constraints.
Q: Who uses this economic indicator?
A: Regulators, investors, and financial analysts monitor these dispute metrics.
Q: What does an increase in disputes suggest?
A: Potentially increased market uncertainty or heightened risk perception.
Related News
Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...
U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| C. Equities. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ78CDSNR
21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed Over the Past Three Months?| C. Pension Plans. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ21CDSNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Interest Rate. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
OTCDQ51BDSNR
22) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ22RBUNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ40ADSNR
77) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Consumer ABS Market Changed?| Answer Type: Improved Considerably
SFQ77PNNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, High-Yield Corporate Bond Lending Disputes (ALLQ79BISNR), retrieved from FRED.