78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency Rmbs. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ78ERBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
16.00
Year-over-Year Change
6.67%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
This economic indicator tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) lending over a three-month period. The metric provides insights into the stability and potential friction in the secondary mortgage market.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
The trend represents the volume of disputes related to lending against non-agency RMBS, which can signal market sentiment and potential challenges in mortgage-backed securities trading. Economists use this data to assess market liquidity, risk perception, and potential systemic financial stress.
Methodology
Data is collected through surveys and reporting mechanisms from financial institutions involved in mortgage-backed securities transactions.
Historical Context
This indicator is used by policymakers and financial analysts to understand potential risks and market dynamics in the mortgage securities landscape.
Key Facts
- Tracks disputes in non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities lending
- Provides insight into market stability and potential friction
- Remained basically unchanged over the reported three-month period
FAQs
Q: What are non-agency RMBS?
A: Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities are mortgage pools not guaranteed by government-sponsored enterprises like Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
Q: Why are mark and collateral disputes important?
A: These disputes can indicate potential risks, valuation challenges, or market uncertainties in mortgage-backed securities trading.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically, this type of economic indicator is updated quarterly or as market conditions change significantly.
Q: What does 'remained basically unchanged' mean?
A: It suggests that the volume of disputes has not significantly increased or decreased during the reported period.
Q: Who uses this economic indicator?
A: Financial analysts, policymakers, investors, and researchers use this data to assess mortgage market conditions and potential risks.
Related Trends
12) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Trading Reits Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and Otc Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ12ECNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 3. Adoption of More-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ25A3MINR
9) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Availability of Additional (and Currently Unutilized) Financial Leverage Under Agreements Currently in Place with Hedge Funds (for Example, Under Prime Broker, Warehouse Agreements, and Other Committed but Undrawn or Partly Drawn Facilities) Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ09ICNR
43) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Interest Rate Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
OTCDQ43AICNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 1. Improvement in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ19B12MINR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Cmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ70A1TCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, 78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| E. Non-Agency Rmbs. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged [ALLQ78ERBUNR], retrieved from FRED.
Last Checked: 8/1/2025