78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| B. High-Yield Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ78BISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in mark and collateral disputes for high-yield corporate bonds. Provides insights into lending market complexity and risk.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks the volume of disputes related to high-yield corporate bond collateral. It reflects transactional challenges in credit markets.
Methodology
Surveyed from financial institutions reporting dispute volume quarterly.
Historical Context
Used by regulators and financial analysts to assess lending market friction.
Key Facts
- Increased dispute volume signals market complexity
- Reflects potential lending market challenges
- Quarterly reporting mechanism
FAQs
Q: What causes collateral disputes?
A: Disputes can arise from valuation differences, contract interpretations, or changing market conditions.
Q: Why track dispute volumes?
A: Increasing disputes may indicate growing uncertainty or complexity in lending markets.
Q: How frequently are disputes measured?
A: This indicator is typically updated on a quarterly basis.
Q: What do increased disputes mean?
A: They can signal heightened risk, more complex lending environments, or changing market dynamics.
Q: Who uses this data?
A: Regulators, financial analysts, and risk management professionals monitor these trends.
Related Trends
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
ALLQ56B4TSNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Commodity. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ51FDSNR
22) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ22DSNR
54) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of High-Grade Corporate Bonds by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
SFQ54ICNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 3. Adoption of Less-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ37B32MINR
46) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Credit Derivatives Referencing Securitized Products (Such as Specific ABS or MBS Tranches and Associated Indexes) Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
OTCDQ46AISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, High-Yield Bond Collateral Disputes (ALLQ78BISNR), retrieved from FRED.