78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| A. High-Grade Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ78ARBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
20.00
Year-over-Year Change
-4.76%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for high-grade corporate bond lending. Provides insight into lending market stability and risk assessment.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This metric evaluates dispute volumes in corporate bond lending transactions. It helps financial institutions understand market friction and transaction complexity.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from financial institutions tracking lending dispute patterns.
Historical Context
Used by risk managers and financial regulators to assess lending market conditions.
Key Facts
- Indicates stability in high-grade corporate bond lending
- Reflects transaction complexity in financial markets
- Important for risk management assessments
FAQs
Q: What do mark and collateral disputes indicate?
A: They reveal potential friction or disagreement in lending transactions. Disputes can signal market uncertainty or valuation challenges.
Q: Why are high-grade corporate bond disputes important?
A: They provide insights into market liquidity and transaction smoothness. Lower dispute volumes suggest more efficient lending practices.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically collected quarterly through financial institution surveys. Provides periodic market condition snapshots.
Q: Who uses this dispute volume data?
A: Risk managers, financial regulators, and institutional investors analyze these metrics for market insights.
Q: What does 'remained basically unchanged' mean?
A: Indicates minimal variation in dispute volumes over the past three months. Suggests stable lending market conditions.
Related News
Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...
U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ66B1ESNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ40AICNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ66A4TCNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
SFQ62B1TSNR
44) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Equity Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
OTCDQ44ADSNR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 2. Reduced Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ31A22MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (ALLQ78ARBUNR), retrieved from FRED.