78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| A. High-Grade Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ78AICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for high-grade corporate bond lending. Provides insight into lending market dynamics and potential risk indicators.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This metric measures dispute volume in corporate bond lending transactions. It helps assess market friction and potential lending environment challenges.
Methodology
Surveyed from financial institutions tracking lending dispute volumes quarterly.
Historical Context
Used by risk managers and financial regulators to monitor lending market conditions.
Key Facts
- Indicates lending market transaction complexity
- Quarterly measurement of dispute trends
- Reflects high-grade corporate bond lending dynamics
FAQs
Q: What do mark and collateral disputes indicate?
A: Disputes signal potential friction in lending transactions. They can reveal underlying market stress or valuation challenges.
Q: Why are high-grade corporate bond disputes important?
A: They provide early signals of lending market health and potential risk perception among financial institutions.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: The data is collected and reported quarterly by financial institutions.
Q: Who uses this dispute volume data?
A: Risk managers, financial regulators, and institutional investors analyze these trends.
Q: What might cause an increase in disputes?
A: Market volatility, valuation disagreements, or changing lending standards can increase dispute volumes.
Related News
Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...
U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
27) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Insurance Companies Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ27ICNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ56B2RBUNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 4. Higher Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ37A43MINR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 4. Higher Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ31A42MINR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ19A73MINR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including MBS and ABS. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
OTCDQ51EDSNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (ALLQ78AICNR), retrieved from FRED.