78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| A. High-Grade Corporate Bonds. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ78AICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for high-grade corporate bond lending. Provides insight into lending market dynamics and potential risk indicators.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This metric measures dispute volume in corporate bond lending transactions. It helps assess market friction and potential lending environment challenges.
Methodology
Surveyed from financial institutions tracking lending dispute volumes quarterly.
Historical Context
Used by risk managers and financial regulators to monitor lending market conditions.
Key Facts
- Indicates lending market transaction complexity
- Quarterly measurement of dispute trends
- Reflects high-grade corporate bond lending dynamics
FAQs
Q: What do mark and collateral disputes indicate?
A: Disputes signal potential friction in lending transactions. They can reveal underlying market stress or valuation challenges.
Q: Why are high-grade corporate bond disputes important?
A: They provide early signals of lending market health and potential risk perception among financial institutions.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: The data is collected and reported quarterly by financial institutions.
Q: Who uses this dispute volume data?
A: Risk managers, financial regulators, and institutional investors analyze these trends.
Q: What might cause an increase in disputes?
A: Market volatility, valuation disagreements, or changing lending standards can increase dispute volumes.
Related Trends
13) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Trading Reits Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 11 and 12), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 2. Reduced Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ13A23MINR
42) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Fx Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ42ARBUNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ66A3RBUNR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 2. Reduced Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ31A2MINR
1) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Amount of Resources and Attention Your Firm Devotes to Management of Concentrated Credit Exposure to Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries (Such as Large Banking Institutions) Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ01RBUNR
13) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Trading Reits Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 11 and 12), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 2. Reduced Willingness of Your Institution to Take on Risk. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ13A22MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (ALLQ78AICNR), retrieved from FRED.