69) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Non-Agency Rmbs Market Changed?| Answer Type: Deteriorated Somewhat
ALLQ69EONR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
-100.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks liquidity and market functioning in non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS). Provides critical insight into secondary mortgage market conditions.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator measures changes in market dynamics for non-agency RMBS. It helps investors and analysts understand market stress and trading conditions.
Methodology
Collected through survey-based assessment of market participants' perceptions.
Historical Context
Used by financial regulators and institutional investors to gauge market health.
Key Facts
- Indicates potential market stress in mortgage securities
- Reflects investor sentiment in non-agency RMBS
- Critical for understanding secondary mortgage market
FAQs
Q: What are non-agency RMBS?
A: Mortgage-backed securities not guaranteed by government-sponsored enterprises like Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
Q: Why is RMBS market liquidity important?
A: Reflects overall health of mortgage markets and potential investment risks.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically surveyed quarterly by financial institutions and regulatory bodies.
Q: What causes changes in RMBS market liquidity?
A: Economic conditions, interest rates, and investor confidence impact market functioning.
Q: Can this indicator predict market trends?
A: Provides early signals of potential market stress or improving conditions.
Related Trends
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ62A3ECNR
10) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Hedge Funds Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ10ICNR
45) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Credit Derivatives Referencing Corporates (Single-Name Corporates or Corporate Indexes) Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ45BRBUNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 6. Improvement in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: First in Importance
ALLQ25B6MINR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ66A2ESNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 4. Higher Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ37A4MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Non-Agency RMBS Market Liquidity (ALLQ69EONR), retrieved from FRED.