68) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Non-Agency Rmbs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ68ICNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in demand for non-agency RMBS term funding over 30 days. Provides critical insight into institutional lending market dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks institutional client demand for longer-term mortgage-backed securities funding.
Methodology
Surveyed from financial institutions reporting funding demand changes.
Historical Context
Used to assess credit market appetite and institutional investment strategies.
Key Facts
- Indicates institutional investment trends
- Reflects market liquidity conditions
- Measures long-term funding preferences
FAQs
Q: What does 'increased considerably' mean?
A: Significant rise in demand for term funding over 30 days for non-agency RMBS.
Q: Why track non-agency RMBS funding?
A: Provides insights into credit market health and institutional investment strategies.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: Typically reported quarterly by financial institutions.
Q: Who monitors this economic indicator?
A: Investors, financial analysts, and economic policymakers use this data.
Q: What implications does increased demand have?
A: Suggests growing confidence in mortgage-backed securities market.
Related Trends
45) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Credit Derivatives Referencing Corporates (Single-Name Corporates or Corporate Indexes) Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ45ARBUNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ37B42MINR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
CTQ40AICNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ19A73MINR
67) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Non-Agency Rmbs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ67ISNR
70) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which CMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
SFQ70B4TCNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Non-Agency RMBS Term Funding (ALLQ68ICNR), retrieved from FRED.