51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including Mbs and Abs. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ51EDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
This economic trend measures changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes relating to credit referencing securitized products, including mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and asset-backed securities (ABS). It provides insights into market liquidity and risk assessment in the securitized products sector.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
The Federal Reserve's 'Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?' survey tracks changes in the securitized products market. This metric helps policymakers and analysts understand market dynamics and participant behavior in this crucial area of fixed-income investments.
Methodology
The data is collected through a quarterly survey of major financial institutions.
Historical Context
This trend is used to monitor conditions in the securitized products market, which has significant implications for broader credit availability and financial stability.
Key Facts
- Trend measures changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes.
- Provides insights into market liquidity and risk assessment in securitized products.
- Collected through quarterly survey of major financial institutions.
FAQs
Q: What does this economic trend measure?
A: This trend measures changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes relating to credit referencing securitized products, including mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and asset-backed securities (ABS).
Q: Why is this trend relevant for users or analysts?
A: This metric helps policymakers and analysts understand market dynamics and participant behavior in the crucial securitized products sector, which has significant implications for broader credit availability and financial stability.
Q: How is this data collected or calculated?
A: The data is collected through a quarterly survey of major financial institutions.
Q: How is this trend used in economic policy?
A: This trend is used to monitor conditions in the securitized products market, which is important for assessing credit availability and financial system stability.
Q: Are there update delays or limitations?
A: The data is collected and published on a quarterly basis, so there may be some delay in availability.
Related Trends
8) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Hedge Funds Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ08RBUNR
54) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of High-Grade Corporate Bonds by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ54RBUNR
21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed over the Past Three Months?| C. Pension Plans. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ21CDCNR
75) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Consumer ABS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ75RBUNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ66A1ESNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 1. Improvement in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ37B13MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, 'Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| E. Credit Referencing Securitized Products Including Mbs and Abs. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably' (ALLQ51EDCNR), retrieved from FRED.