40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
ALLQ40FDCNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
1.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
This economic indicator tracks changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes within separately managed accounts established with investment advisers. The trend provides insights into financial service interactions and potential resolution efficiency in investment management.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
The metric reflects the evolving dynamics of dispute resolution in investment advisory relationships, specifically focusing on how quickly and effectively mark and collateral disputes are being addressed. Economists use this data to understand potential friction points in financial service transactions and client-advisor interactions.
Methodology
Data is likely collected through surveys and reporting mechanisms from investment advisory firms, tracking the changes in dispute resolution timelines and characteristics.
Historical Context
This trend is used to assess financial service quality, operational efficiency, and potential regulatory compliance in investment management practices.
Key Facts
- Focuses on separately managed investment accounts
- Tracks changes in dispute duration and persistence
- Provides insights into financial service efficiency
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: It measures changes in the duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes in separately managed investment accounts over a three-month period.
Q: Why are mark and collateral disputes important?
A: These disputes can indicate potential inefficiencies or communication challenges in investment management relationships, which can impact overall financial service quality.
Q: How is this data collected?
A: The data is likely gathered through systematic surveys and reporting mechanisms from investment advisory firms tracking dispute resolution characteristics.
Q: What does a 'Decreased Considerably' result suggest?
A: A significant decrease suggests improved dispute resolution processes, more efficient communication, or potentially clearer contractual frameworks in investment advisory relationships.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: The indicator appears to be tracked on a quarterly basis, providing a periodic snapshot of dispute resolution trends in investment management.
Related Trends
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ37A72MINR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer ABS (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ74B2ESNR
74) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Consumer Abs (for Example, Backed by Credit Card Receivables or Auto Loans) Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ74A2ECNR
21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed Over the Past Three Months?| A. Mutual Funds. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
CTQ21ARBUNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ56B4TCNR
78) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Lending Against Each of the Following Collateral Types Changed?| F. Cmbs. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ78FRBUNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, 40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably [ALLQ40FDCNR], retrieved from FRED.
Last Checked: 8/1/2025