40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| D. Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ40DDSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
3.00
Year-over-Year Change
50.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in duration and persistence of mark and collateral disputes for mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments. Provides insights into financial transaction dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This economic indicator tracks dispute characteristics across institutional investment entities. It helps understand market interaction complexities.
Methodology
Quarterly survey collecting data on dispute duration and persistence from financial institutions.
Historical Context
Used by policymakers to assess financial market transaction efficiency.
Key Facts
- Tracks institutional investment dispute characteristics
- Quarterly measurement of transaction complexity
- Covers multiple investment entity types
FAQs
Q: What entities are included in this survey?
A: Mutual funds, ETFs, pension plans, and endowments are surveyed about mark and collateral disputes.
Q: Why track dispute duration?
A: Helps understand market friction and transaction efficiency in financial markets.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Collected and updated quarterly through institutional surveys.
Q: What insights can be gained?
A: Reveals trends in financial transaction complexity and potential market challenges.
Q: Are there any data collection limitations?
A: Survey-based method may not capture all nuanced market interactions.
Related News
Gen Z In the U.S. Shifts From Spending To Saving Habits
How Gen Z's Shift from Spending to Saving is Impacting the US Economy Recent trends indicate a significant shift in the spending habits of Gen Z, w...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Stock Market Futures Rise On Inflation and Tariff News
US Stock Market Futures Rise Amid Inflation Data and Tariff News US stock market futures are on the rise, driven by significant updates in inflatio...
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
U.S. Stock Market Rises Amid PCE Inflation Report Analysis
U.S. Stock Market Climbs Amidst Insights from PCE Inflation Report Investors in the U.S. stock market are focusing on the most recent PCE Inflation...
U.S. Stock Futures Stagnant Despite Positive Jobless Claims and GDP
Why US Stock Futures Remain Stagnant Despite Positive Economic Indicators The current investment landscape is puzzling for many as US stock futures...
Related Trends
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 6. Improvement in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ31B63MINR
71) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of CMBS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
SFQ71DCNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ62B2TCNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ37A12MINR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 6. Worsening in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ31A62MINR
22) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
CTQ22ISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Mark and Collateral Disputes (ALLQ40DDSNR), retrieved from FRED.