39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ39FRBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
19.00
Year-over-Year Change
5.56%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Monitors changes in mark and collateral disputes for separately managed accounts with investment advisers. Provides insights into financial transaction management.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This indicator tracks the stability of dispute volumes in investment account management. It reflects operational consistency in financial services.
Methodology
Collected through quarterly survey of financial institutions and investment advisers.
Historical Context
Used to assess operational stability in investment account management.
Key Facts
- Tracks investment account dispute volumes
- Quarterly survey-based metric
- Indicates operational stability
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes for separately managed investment accounts. Reflects operational consistency.
Q: How frequently is this data updated?
A: Collected quarterly through surveys of financial institutions and investment advisers.
Q: Why are dispute volumes important?
A: Indicates operational efficiency and potential risks in investment account management.
Q: What does 'remained basically unchanged' mean?
A: Suggests stable dispute volumes with no significant increases or decreases in the reporting period.
Q: What are the limitations of this data?
A: Survey-based metric may not capture all nuanced dispute dynamics in investment accounts.
Related Trends
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
SFQ62B2TSNR
13) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Trading REITs Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 11 and 12), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 5. Increased Availability of Balance Sheet or Capital at Your Institution. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ13B53MINR
21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed Over the Past Three Months?| D. Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ21DDSNR
51) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes Relating to Contracts of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Fx. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ51ARBUNR
77) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Liquidity and Functioning in the Consumer ABS Market Changed?| Answer Type: Improved Somewhat
SFQ77MONR
12) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Your Use of Nonprice Terms (for Example, Haircuts, Maximum Maturity, Covenants, Cure Periods, Cross-Default Provisions or Other Documentation Features) with Respect to Trading REITs Across the Entire Spectrum of Securities Financing and OTC Derivatives Transaction Types Changed, Regardless of Price Terms?| Answer Type: Tightened Somewhat
CTQ12TSNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Investment Account Dispute Survey (ALLQ39FRBUNR), retrieved from FRED.