39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
ALLQ39ARBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
19.00
Year-over-Year Change
5.56%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes among financial intermediaries. Provides insight into market stability and transaction dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Measures dispute volumes between dealers and financial intermediaries. Indicates potential friction in financial markets.
Methodology
Collected through quarterly surveys of financial market participants.
Historical Context
Used by regulators to assess market friction and transaction efficiency.
Key Facts
- Monitors dispute volumes in financial markets
- Reflects transaction complexity
- Indicates potential market friction
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Tracks dispute volumes between dealers and financial intermediaries. Shows market transaction dynamics.
Q: Why are mark and collateral disputes important?
A: They indicate potential friction and efficiency in financial market transactions.
Q: How often is this data collected?
A: Collected quarterly through professional financial market surveys.
Q: Who uses this economic data?
A: Regulators, financial analysts, and market researchers use this information.
Q: What are the data's potential limitations?
A: Relies on survey responses and may not capture all market interactions.
Related Trends
46) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Credit Derivatives Referencing Securitized Products (Such as Specific ABS or MBS Tranches and Associated Indexes) Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
OTCDQ46BDSNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 1. Deterioration in Current or Expected Financial Strength of Counterparties. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
ALLQ19A12MINR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 3. Haircuts. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ56A3TCNR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ66A1ESNR
75) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Consumer Abs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ75DSNR
26) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Insurance Companies to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ26ICNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Financial Market Disputes (ALLQ39ARBUNR), retrieved from FRED.