39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ39AISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
-100.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes with financial intermediaries. Provides critical insight into financial sector transaction complexity.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Measures dispute volume between dealers and financial intermediaries. Indicates potential friction in financial transactions.
Methodology
Surveyed data from financial institutions reporting dispute frequency.
Historical Context
Used to assess transactional risks in financial intermediary relationships.
Key Facts
- Indicates financial transaction complexity
- Reflects potential market friction
- Tracks inter-institutional relationship dynamics
FAQs
Q: What causes mark and collateral disputes?
A: Differences in valuation, interpretation of agreements, and complex financial instruments can trigger disputes.
Q: Why are these disputes significant?
A: They can indicate systemic risks and inefficiencies in financial market transactions.
Q: How do disputes impact financial markets?
A: Increased disputes can slow transactions and potentially increase market uncertainty.
Q: Who typically resolves these disputes?
A: Legal teams, arbitration panels, and regulatory bodies help resolve financial transaction conflicts.
Q: Can dispute trends predict market conditions?
A: Dispute frequency can signal underlying market stress or changing transactional complexity.
Related Trends
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ66A1ESNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ37B43MINR
15) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution for Such Clients, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Trading Reits Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ15ISNR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably
ALLQ56A1TCNR
40) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Duration and Persistence of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| F. Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ40FICNR
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| G. Nonfinancial Corporations. | Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
CTQ39GISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Financial Intermediary Disputes (ALLQ39AISNR), retrieved from FRED.