39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| A. Dealers and Other Financial Intermediaries. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ39ADSNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
2.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures changes in mark and collateral disputes with financial intermediaries. Provides insights into financial transaction complexity and potential market friction.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This trend tracks dispute volume between financial entities, indicating potential transactional challenges. Reflects market interaction dynamics.
Methodology
Collected through quarterly survey of financial institutions reporting dispute volumes.
Historical Context
Used to assess financial market transaction efficiency and potential systemic risks.
Key Facts
- Quarterly financial dispute tracking
- Focuses on dealer and intermediary interactions
- Indicates market transaction complexity
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Tracks changes in mark and collateral disputes among financial intermediaries.
Q: How frequently is this data collected?
A: Updated quarterly through specialized financial surveys.
Q: Why are financial disputes important?
A: Indicate potential friction in financial transactions and market efficiency.
Q: Who analyzes these dispute trends?
A: Financial regulators, risk managers, and economic researchers use this data.
Q: What are the data's potential limitations?
A: Represents survey responses, which may not capture all market nuances.
Related Trends
44) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to OTC Equity Derivatives Changed?| B. Initial Margin Requirements for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration, And/or Extent of Relationship. | Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
OTCDQ44BDCNR
21) Considering the Entire Range of Transactions Facilitated by Your Institution, How Has the Use of Financial Leverage by Each of the Following Types of Clients Changed Over the Past Three Months?| D. Endowments. | Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ21DDSNR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 3. Adoption of More-Stringent Market Conventions (That Is, Collateral Terms and Agreements, ISDA Protocols). | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
CTQ31A33MINR
56) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Yield Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 1. Maximum Amount of Funding. | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
ALLQ56A1ESNR
22) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ22ICNR
49) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Posting of Nonstandard Collateral (That is, Other Than Cash and U.S. Treasury Securities) as Permitted Under Relevant Agreements Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ49ISNR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Financial Dispute Volumes (ALLQ39ADSNR), retrieved from FRED.