38) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Nonfinancial Corporations to Negotiate More Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
ALLQ38ISNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
-100.00%
Date Range
10/1/2011 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Tracks negotiation intensity of nonfinancial corporations seeking more favorable terms. Provides insight into corporate strategic behaviors and market dynamics.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
This metric measures how aggressively companies are pursuing price and nonprice negotiations across various sectors. It reflects corporate adaptation strategies.
Methodology
Survey-based data collection from corporate respondents about negotiation efforts.
Historical Context
Used by economists to assess corporate strategic responses to market conditions.
Key Facts
- Indicates corporate strategic adaptation
- Reflects market negotiation pressures
- Provides economic sentiment indicator
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: Tracks the intensity of nonfinancial corporations' efforts to negotiate more favorable business terms.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically updated quarterly as part of corporate survey responses.
Q: Why are corporate negotiations important?
A: They reflect market competitiveness and companies' strategic responses to economic conditions.
Q: How do economists use this data?
A: To understand corporate behavior and potential shifts in market dynamics.
Q: What limitations exist in this metric?
A: Relies on survey responses and may not capture all corporate negotiation nuances.
Related Trends
22) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Mutual Funds, ETFs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Changed Over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
CTQ22DSNR
76) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Term Funding with a Maturity Greater Than 30 Days of Consumer ABS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Increased Somewhat
SFQ76ISNR
31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: First In Importance
CTQ31B7MINR
2) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Amount of Resources and Attention Your Firm Devotes to Management of Concentrated Credit Exposure to Central Counterparties and Other Financial Utilities Changed?| Answer Type: Decreased Considerably
CTQ02DCNR
75) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Consumer ABS by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged
SFQ75RBUNR
37) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Nonfinancial Corporations Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 35 and 36), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 2nd Most Important
CTQ37A72MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Corporate Negotiation Intensity (ALLQ38ISNR), retrieved from FRED.