31) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Investment Advisers Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 29 and 30), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| A. Possible Reasons for Tightening | 7. Less-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ31A73MINR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)
Latest Value
0.00
Year-over-Year Change
N/A%
Date Range
1/1/2012 - 1/1/2025
Summary
Measures competitive dynamics in financial institutions' investment adviser account management. Provides insight into market competition and institutional strategies.
Analysis & Context
This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.
Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.
About This Dataset
Tracks the impact of reduced competition from other financial institutions on account management terms.
Methodology
Collected through survey responses from financial institutions about market competition.
Historical Context
Used to understand competitive landscape in financial services and lending practices.
Key Facts
- Reflects institutional competitive landscape
- Indicates market concentration trends
- Measures inter-institutional dynamics
FAQs
Q: What does this economic indicator measure?
A: It tracks reduced competition among financial institutions in investment adviser account management.
Q: How is this data collected?
A: Through periodic surveys of financial institutions about market competition and account terms.
Q: Why is this indicator important?
A: It provides insight into market dynamics and competitive strategies in financial services.
Q: How often is this data updated?
A: Typically updated quarterly as part of comprehensive financial institution surveys.
Q: What does reduced competition indicate?
A: It may suggest market consolidation or increased barriers to entry in financial services.
Related News
U.S. Treasury Yields Decline After Inflation Data Meet Expectations
US Treasury Yields Drop as Inflation Data Meets Expectations US Treasury yields have seen a noticeable decline recently, as the latest inflation da...
S&P 500 Rises With Optimistic U.S. Inflation Report
S&P 500 Soars: Positive U.S. Inflation Developments The S&P 500, a primary stock index that tracks the performance of 500 major U.S. companies, has...
U.S. Home Sales Decline In August Due To High Prices
August 2023 U.S. Home Sales Decline Amid Rising Mortgage Rates and High Prices In August 2023, U.S. home sales experienced a notable decline, highl...
U.S. Trade Deficit Decreases As Businesses Anticipate Tariff Hikes
U.S. Trade Deficit Reaches Two-Year Low Amid Anticipated Tariff Hikes The recent announcement that the U.S. trade deficit has reached a two-year lo...
U.S. Natural Gas Storage Increases Due to Market Dynamics
Navigating Market Volatility: U.S. Natural Gas Storage Strategies and Trends Understanding the dynamics of the U.S. natural gas storage sector is c...
U.S. GDP Growth to Slow Due to Tariffs and Immigration Policies
How Tariffs and Immigration Policies Influence U.S. GDP Growth in 2025 The U.S. GDP is a fundamental gauge of the country's economic health. Recent...
Related Trends
39) Over the Past Three Months, How Has the Volume of Mark and Collateral Disputes with Clients of Each of the Following Types Changed?| B. Hedge Funds. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably
ALLQ39BICNR
25) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Insurance Companies Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 23 and 24), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 7. More-Aggressive Competition from Other Institutions. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ25B73MINR
66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency RMBS Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads Over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat
SFQ66A4ESNR
62) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Considerably
ALLQ62A4ECNR
34) How Has the Provision of Differential Terms by Your Institution to Separately Managed Accounts Established with Most-Favored (as a Function of Breadth, Duration, and Extent of Relationship) Investment Advisers Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Decreased Somewhat
ALLQ34DSNR
19) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Mutual Funds, Etfs, Pension Plans, and Endowments Have Tightened or Eased over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 17 and 18), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 4. Lower Internal Treasury Charges for Funding. | Answer Type: 3rd Most Important
ALLQ19B43MINR
Citation
U.S. Federal Reserve, Competition Indicator (ALLQ31A73MINR), retrieved from FRED.