7) How Has the Intensity of Efforts by Hedge Funds to Negotiate More-Favorable Price and Nonprice Terms Changed over the Past Three Months?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ07RBUNR • Economic Data from Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED)

Latest Value

16.00

Year-over-Year Change

-27.27%

Date Range

7/1/2011 - 1/1/2025

Summary

Measures hedge funds' negotiation efforts for pricing and terms in financial transactions. Provides insights into market dynamics and institutional bargaining power.

Analysis & Context

This economic indicator provides valuable insights into current market conditions and economic trends. The data is updated regularly by the Federal Reserve and represents one of the most reliable sources for economic analysis.

Understanding this metric helps economists, policymakers, and investors make informed decisions about economic conditions and future trends. The interactive chart above allows you to explore historical patterns and identify key trends over time.

About This Dataset

This indicator tracks changes in hedge funds' negotiation intensity for financial agreements. It reflects market competitiveness and institutional strategies.

Methodology

Quarterly survey of financial institutions assessing negotiation intensity.

Historical Context

Used by market analysts to understand hedge fund market behavior.

Key Facts

  • Quarterly assessment of negotiation efforts
  • Reflects market competitive landscape
  • Indicates institutional bargaining strategies

FAQs

Q: What does this negotiation intensity metric measure?

A: It tracks changes in hedge funds' efforts to negotiate financial transaction terms.

Q: How frequently is this data collected?

A: The metric is updated quarterly through institutional surveys.

Q: Why are hedge fund negotiations important?

A: They reveal market competitiveness and institutional strategic approaches.

Q: Who analyzes this financial data?

A: Market analysts, investors, and financial researchers use this metric.

Q: What are the metric's potential limitations?

A: Survey-based data may not capture all nuanced negotiation dynamics.

Related Trends

52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Tightened Considerably

ALLQ52B4TCNR

71) Over the Past Three Months, How Has Demand for Funding of Cmbs by Your Institution's Clients Changed?| Answer Type: Remained Basically Unchanged

ALLQ71RBUNR

42) Over the Past Three Months, How Have Initial Margin Requirements Set by Your Institution with Respect to Otc Fx Derivatives Changed?| A. Initial Margin Requirements for Average Clients. | Answer Type: Increased Considerably

ALLQ42AICNR

6) To the Extent That the Price or Nonprice Terms Applied to Hedge Funds Have Tightened or Eased Over the Past Three Months (as Reflected in Your Responses to Questions 4 and 5), What Are the Most Important Reasons for the Change?| B. Possible Reasons for Easing | 6. Improvement in General Market Liquidity and Functioning. | Answer Type: First In Importance

CTQ06B6MINR

66) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which Non-Agency Rmbs Are Funded Changed?| A. Terms for Average Clients | 2. Maximum Maturity. | Answer Type: Eased Considerably

ALLQ66A2ECNR

52) Over the Past Three Months, How Have the Terms Under Which High-Grade Corporate Bonds Are Funded Changed?| B. Terms for Most Favored Clients, as a Consequence of Breadth, Duration And/or Extent of Relationship | 4. Collateral Spreads over Relevant Benchmark (Effective Financing Rates). | Answer Type: Eased Somewhat

ALLQ52B4ESNR

Citation

U.S. Federal Reserve, Hedge Fund Negotiation Intensity (ALLQ07RBUNR), retrieved from FRED.